Four years ago, when I was still an undergraduate
student, the most excited activity I remembered was provided by Chinamobile. We
could use the credit in our accounts to exchange McDonald’s meal combos. I used
1500 M credit (one RMB input to account = one M credit) and get a text saying I
can show this text to any McDonald’s in Beijing and get one specified meal
combo. I brought this text and give my Nokia (Symbian) to counter, and he just scanned
my phone by a small black machine while passing my meal. It took me less than 2
mins from stepping into Mc to leaving, counting into waiting in line, and I didn’t
even need to order. At that time, the only sentence in my mind was: Holy! How
magic technology is!
Four years past, right now, I not only knew
what the magic text contained, but also learned international name for that
magic—Quick Response. The article I read gave us a lot of statistics showing
that QR is becoming a fast growing tool for marketing. And it also provided us
who and how provide and receive information form QR. The question I generated
at first was that why home usage is higher than outdoors. As my understanding
for QR, it’s a convenient method for customers to get more information while
shopping, or being used as a ticket or coupon, just as what I did in Mc. That
says, usage at outside or stores supposed to be higher. However, when I saw
that almost 50% scanned QR were from newspaper or magazines, I began to
understand. People are more likely get discount or product information from reading
mails, newspapers, magazines, etc., or surfing on PC, all of which are more
possible down at office or home.
Since half of scanned happened at home or
office where has PC. I’m wondering why they can’t just set a scanner into PC.
When I needed to read some product information at home or near a PC, I preferred
to read them on PC because when I found some interesting factors of that product,
I can buy it by simply clicking the link driving me to online store.
Good job. Is it a QR code which McDonald sent you to present at its store? I never know that and I was thinking it was just a text. I mean it is amazing that I didn't realize that QR code has entered customer's life for such a long time! I was considering it as an emerging technology. It is very interesting to show your real life experience of QR code.
ReplyDeleteI also doubted the using location, which the statistic shows the home or office is the No.1 location, at first. My own experience tells me that outside or store is the most frequently QR code using location. But as you mentioned, QR scanning from prints is reasonable.
Another question we both considered, as you replied in my post, is the QR code reader issue. It is very interesting that you pointed out the possibility of setting QR code reader directly into PCs. I think it is more feasible to set the reader into the smart phones. I have two reasons.
Firstly, smart phone is more portable to move so that you can target the QR codes on prints or webs. In contrast, PCs are a little bit too stupid to move. Thus you probably have to lift the QR codes on prints in front of the PC's camera. This process is harder for PCs than smart phones...and a little bit funny I think. Moreover, how about the codes on the webs?
Secondly, I view it is easier to make purchase on PCs than mobiles since typing and searching on PCs are easier. But not mobiles. However, statistic shows that the rate of people using smart phones to make purchase is increasing. Therefore, QR code is a tool to simplify and accelerate the purchasing with phones.
These are my opinions on setting reader into PCs. But I couldn't agree more that setting a standard reader into mobile phones is a good proposal.
Nan,
ReplyDeleteWe almost make the same point on the QR code issues. What a coincidence!
I highly doubt the future of QR codes. I am wondering if the QR codes can be as successful as the bar code we are using now. The bar code has been widely used everywhere, not only in people’s daily life, but also in manufacturing. Since QR codes can contain more information in it, it should reach out wider population. However, the reality is not it. As Iris has said in her comments above, we girls seldom care about the QR codes. The major reason is that we don’t have the needs. As I said in my blog, the QR codes should be applied to some places where it can be unique and exclusive to people to open a new market.
First of all, I have the same feeling with Iris - QR code is an emerging technology. It is not as mature as the barcode or RFID. However, I believe that QR code will be developed and will have more profound impact to the customers than those two kinds of codes. It carries more information than barcode, and it reacts faster than barcode. On the side of customers, it is a greater innovation for them than other codes. Another thing I want to mention is about the PC scanner. I think it is a creative idea, nevertheless, tablet scanner can be more feasible than the PC scanner because of the portable property.
ReplyDelete