About 13 years before, I found a piece of glass in “Axiangpo” hot
sauce, and at that time, I did think about whether to call media and gain some
compensation from Taiyang Co. However, concerned about that there would be huge
numbers of calls I needed to make and I was really a little girl and maybe
nobody would listen to me, I gave up. What would I do if I was in this modern
society, I asked myself. The answer is: I would never get them off easily! How
if I ate that glass? I did not even dare to think about the result! I would use
as many as sources--Facebook, Renen, Weibo, twitter, or whatever--to stop the
same thing happening on other customers. The changing behavior is fortunate to
customers, and to companies, I can only say: I’m sorry, watch out before you do
anything!
For P&G, let’s get rid of the possibility that competitors’ adding
fuel to the fire, although there is a high possibility, the crisis they faced is
pretty common in our society. We should never doubt the power of gossip, not to
mention something really happened. The company I worked for had faced with the
same problem, and the only difference is that my company is pure innocence. One
of the products in US General Mills had some “quality problem” since a kind of heavy
metal excess Chines eligible heavy metal level. (China and USA has different heavy
metal standard level, and that product was only sold in USA, which is eligible)
And that news translated by Chinese media was: Haggen-Daze, which is the main
product of China General Mills had problem of high level heavy metal. Ridiculous!
I laughed out when I first heard about this news, I thought nobody would
believe that since they cannot prove anything. However, when I saw my director’s
face, I realized that things would not as simple as I thought. Customers would
like to believe whatever news harmful to them. And the result is my boss had to
call media she knew one by one and explained the truth to them, she almost had
no food and sleep during that two days. (I have to say that every time this
kind of things happened I always felicitated myself secretly that I was only a
small intern.)
Things became more seriously when it came to babies. I feel painful and
angry when I read what Moms write about the pain their babies going through.
Babies are so innocence. And I can’t image what patents feel when they hear
babies crying. When we think about this incident as a real person, everything
happened on social media made sense. I think that also is counted into P&G’s
response strategy, they tried to stand at the Moms’ side and thought like them.
This should be the only thing they could do to calm customers down. I can’t say
what P&G did was right, but it was what most companies did when they faced
with crisis, and it worked. P&G didn’t response to this crisis directly and
they decided to transport customers’ concentration. The Facebook page was still
there but there were more news about how P&G care about babies would occupy
layout of news webs. Time will wash away everything, and what companies need to
do is decrease crisis concentration from customers. After all, we can see Pampers
is still top selling among diapers products.
Reference:
Paul Gillin, Attack
of the Customers: The Pampers Dry Max Crisis
Matt Harrison, P&G
responds to Pampers Dry Max concerns
I usually concern about the responsibility of the media's report nowadays.
ReplyDeleteBut your director's action to the media report is right. Definitely, crisis public relation management should be addressed very carefully and very quickly. Rumors can not wait.
It's helpful that you did research on the existing P&G Facebook page and sales performance of Pamper.Crisis PR management is a temporary powerful action since care from both customer and media results in an "awareness bump" in the society, which matters the prospect of the company. If it conquered, it will prosperous like it's always been. If it failed, the brand image, which built through years, will be ruined during one night. Especially for those well known giant brands.
I really like the examples you give from your practical life and working experience. In the past, customers' compliants are always easy to be ignored by the companies. Thanks to the network and social media, nowadays, customers have places to give out their dissatisfaction as well as sharing their common understanding. Also, while this technology may bring harm to comapny, it facilitate the company making prograss to meet the customer's needs.
ReplyDeleteHa! Nan, Is it "Are you killing me?" or "Are you Kidding me?" Both work for me! I am shocked too.
ReplyDeleteOne thing I want to say is that I really find the "social capital" a great new concept. There are people, a lot of people, who actually care about their influences online or on social media. For those people, who can't be rewarded with money, it is quite smart for marketing people to find a way to go around. In addition, the point of fostering customers with strong social influence is really smart. It's like a process of sharpening a weapon. It will pay back someday.